🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an adorable small “playful character”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a big but guardian-like companion. Zephyr has “constant motion” and moves like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a heart of gold.

Thirty captive beluga whales in a Canadian entertainment facility have been entangled in a struggle between a closed attraction, local and national governments and welfare campaigners.

But those most familiar with the whales say the intense debate over their destiny often overlooks the individual traits of the whales who, after growing up in confinement, have been closely studied by the caretakers who see them each day.

After the national authorities prevented the export of the belugas to China, the struggling facility near the famous falls where they are held stated it would consider to put them down unless the authorities pays for the expense of keeping them alive. Canada’s fisheries minister has rejected that demand, placing the thirty whales in an ever more uncertain circumstance.

Intelligent Marine Mammals

Researchers say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their vocal imitation skills, intellectual tasks and social skills point to they are deeply intelligent animals – something a former trainer discovered first-hand.

She spent three years as a marine mammal specialist, a role that entailed gaining confidence of the aquatic animals.

“Establishing those relationships over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of affection. At the beginning, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so extraordinary and gratifying.”

The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nevertheless surprised by the details and idiosyncrasies in their personalities. She formed a deep bond for a pair of whales with contrasting temperaments.

“Eve selected me. Cleo demanded work,” she said. “Each transformed the way I understand relationships.”

Growing Opposition and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s interaction with the whales progressed against a backdrop of increasing societal concern to their confinement.

During her tenure at the facility, seven belugas and the park’s single killer whale, Kiska, died. In all, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a statistic which the park links to expected lifespan, but which activists say reflects the poor conditions in which they were maintained.

The facility did not admit visitors to the guests over the recent season, but Burgess says she observed directly effects of the shutdown. “Concrete is breaking off from the enclosures because they’re falling apart and not being repaired. The whales are exploratory and so they take pieces and swim around with pieces in their jaws. It’s heartbreaking to see.”

The facility did not comment to a questionnaire, but in the past claimed: “The whales … get far superior health care and 24/7 attention than any human in the UK, or anywhere else.”

Uncertain Future and Proposed Solutions

The former employee was fired from the park in early March following the death of a beluga, an sick beluga the park staff had to humanely kill. She said the facility thought particulars of the incident were shared to the news outlets and she was released shortly thereafter.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ outcome has left her and staff members in anguish. She says the park’s warning to kill its whales is a leverage tool and is a “logistically impossible” endeavor, adding any efforts to euthanize even a individual beluga would require “significant personnel”, vehicles and machinery.

“It’s impossible in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess advocates for calls for the whales to be removed right away from the park, with its failing enclosures and dwindling staff.

In the autumn, the nation’s government official rejected a request to export the whales to China.

“Allowing the request would have meant a continued life in captivity and a reversion to public entertainment,” the official stated. “As society, we know that whales are meant for the sea, not in pools for our amusement. I could not in clear conscience approve an relocation that would perpetuate the situation these belugas have suffered.”

But Burgess said the official’s remarks reflect a more general incorrect perception of the circumstances of existence for belugas raised in confinement.

“The public needs to grasp these are whales that have spent their whole lives in confinement and they will need human care for the foreseeable future,” she said. “People just don’t comprehend that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘close it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Continuing Discussion

As authorities struggle to find a solution, ideas have emerged, some of which have little basis in reality. An idea called for the belugas to be freed into the open waters of northern regions – where whales are a primary resource of nourishment for Indigenous peoples.

A suggested protected area in the region of eastern Canada, which has received regulatory clearance, has been highly debated. The future facility, which includes 100 acres of enclosed sea water, remains undeveloped. Supporters remain hopeful that it could ultimately represent a sustainable solution for some of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s discussed with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “only an untested concept” in the whales’ well-being.

Others say the possibility of a protected habitat represents a changing attitudes away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a viable plan in the coming months.

Charles Vinick, head of the sanctuary project, said the site will mimic the cognitive activities and diet the whales obtain from caretakers, albeit in a much larger space. He said after the health of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|